Saturday, November 27, 2010

Which States Are More Socialist?

This is a cut and paste from CNBC - I was going to link only but the text was too small.  HERE is the link if you wish to go to it. 

"The Most Socialist States in America

The Street | November 26, 2010 | 01:47 PM EST
When the Democratic Party took over the presidency and both houses of Congress in 2008, conservatives were quick to warn their supporters of a coming era of socialism led by President Barack Obama.
Indeed, that message was a constant in the debate over the health care reform bill as well as the Congressional midterm elections, when Tea Party conservatives made taxation a rallying cry for frustrated Americans.
As the narrative of the country’s purported move toward socialism persists, MainStreet decided to evaluate which states were the most and least socialist, to get a picture of how diverse the country is in how states manage their finances.
What is 'Socialist,' Anyway?
To evaluate the degree to which different states manifest socialist principles, we started from the core definition of socialism as a form of government in which the state owns the means of production and allocates resources to its citizens at its discretion.
In other words, a purely socialist state is one in which the state is responsible for 100% of economic output and spends all of it on social programs.
Since no part of the U.S. can be considered purely socialist, we measured total expenditures as a proportion of total economic output to compare the size of the public sector in each state. Using recently released 2009 state gross domestic product figures from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and total state expenditures for fiscal year 2009 from the most recent report of the National Association of State Budget Officers, we have come up with the 10 most socialist states in America.
Read on; the results may surprise you. (Or jump to — Alaska?!)
10. Rhode Island
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $47,837,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $7,587,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 15.9%
On the list of most socialist states, tiny Rhode Island takes the 10th spot. Progressive on many social questions (the state was the second to abolish the death penalty, and was the third to legalize marijuana for medicinal purposes), its residents have voted for Democrats in eight of the last nine presidential elections.
Economically, Rhode Island continually ranks among the states with the highest tax rates. Its property taxes, sales tax and income taxes are all above the respective national averages, not surprising for the 10th most socialist state on our list.
9. Hawaii
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $66,431,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $11,822,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 17.8%
8. Arkansas
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $101,818,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $18,403,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 18.1%
7. Wyoming
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $37,544,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $7,123,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 19.0%
6. Mississippi
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $95,905,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $19,380,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 20.2%
5. New Mexico
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $74,801,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $15,455,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 20.7%
4. Vermont
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $25,438,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $5,341,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 21.0%
3. Alabama
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $169,856,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $46,558,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 27.4%
2. Alaska
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $45,709,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $14,315,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 31.3%
1. West Virginia
Gross Domestic Product (2009): $63,344,000,000
Total State Expenditures (FY 2009): $20,362,000,000
Expenditures as Proportion of GDP: 32.1%
Despite the fact that Republicans won two out of three House seats in the 2010 midterm elections, West Virginia has been a Democratic state for most of its existence.
In fact, Congress’s longest-serving member ever was Robert Byrd, the West Virginia Democrat who, at the time of his death last year, had represented the state for 57 years.
On the state level, four of the past five governors have come from the Democratic Party, which could explain how the state’s expenditures have come to account for 32.1% of total output.
- Greg Bocquet is a writer for MainStreet, part of TheStreet Network."

7 comments:

  1. great mary will put this on my site to okay --

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are always welcome to re post Heidi. I consider it a compliment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It might be interesting if you were to take 8, 7, 6, 3 & 1 and see what portion of the citizens thereof are living at or below the poverty level. Examine the the illiteracy rate in those state. See how many finished high school and how many dropped out before graduating. It would also be interesting to see how many citizens in these state have no health care and/or do not have access to health care.
    It would also be interesting to see what the average salary is of teachers in these states compare to the rest of the nation.

    Remember the old saying "Pay me now or pay me later?"

    It seems to me that it is better to fund good quality education, literacy projects and programs that enhance the quality of life because if you ignore those programs, it will cost a lot more when the state has to provide social services for the unemployed and unemployable, the ill who are uninsurable and the great uneducated masses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well put.

    Great hoardes of the undereducated make for lousy players in our"delightful" global marketplace.

    I always thought Alaskans were getting back a lot from their state with the oil money.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree that the key to almost everything is education - but it is also the challenge.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You are reading the numbers much differently than I am Tim. I could be mistaken since I am not good with numbers or statistics but I thought the entire point of the article was that Alaska is second as far as being more socialistic in our 50 states. That they spend more on social programs than the so called blue states. The point being that the state Sarah Palin was running - Miss hailed by the party of let the market fix everything - is the most socialistic. Your prior comment sounds like you are saying Alaska is not spending money on social programs which is the opposite of what I read the article to mean.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is scary to think of kids coming out of our schools and having to compete globally when we rank low as far as education.

    ReplyDelete